On 8 October 2010 09:28, Andrew Beekhof <and...@beekhof.net> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 8:31 AM, Pavlos Parissis > <pavlos.paris...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 8 October 2010 07:47, Andrew Beekhof <and...@beekhof.net> wrote: >>> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 10:10 PM, Pavlos Parissis >>> <pavlos.paris...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On 7 October 2010 08:33, Andrew Beekhof <and...@beekhof.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Gianluca Cecchi >>>>> <gianluca.cec...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> > On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Shravan Mishra >>>>> > <shravan.mis...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >> That is what I heard too, that's the reason for this question. >>>>> >> >>>>> > >>>>> > On June, inside a complex thread regarding "colocation -inf", Andrew >>>>> > reported the link and also several clarifications after some questions >>>>> > of mine... >>>>> > >>>>> > See in particular: >>>>> > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/2010-June/006606.html >>>>> > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/2010-June/006610.html >>>>> > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/2010-June/006620.html >>>>> > >>>>> > I think they are still valid... >>>>> >>>>> Absolutely. These will all be valid until 1.2 comes out (and then >>>>> they'll apply to 1.3 instead :-) >>>> >>>> I am a bit confused about the meaning of pacemaker-1.0,1.1 and 1.2 >>>> schema, mentioned here >>>> http://theclusterguy.clusterlabs.org/post/441442543/new-pacemaker-release-series >>>> >>>> Let's I have installed 1.1 how do I know if I use pacemaker-1.o or 1.2 >>>> schema? >>>> Sorry if it sounds stupid but I simple don't understand it >>> >>> cibadmin -Ql | grep validate >>> >> >> >> [r...@node-01 ~]# cibadmin -Ql | grep validate >> <cib validate-with="pacemaker-1.0" crm_feature_set="3.0.1" >> have-quorum="1" dc-uuid="b7764e7b-0a00-4745-8d9e-6911271eefb2" >> admin_epoch="0" epoch="271" num_updates="3"> >> >> since validate-with is set to pacemaker-1.0, I am using pacemaker-1.0 >> schema, right? > > Right. > >> So, if I upgrade to 1.1.3 and leave validate-with to pacemaker-1.0, I >> will run a stable 1.1.3, but if I set to pacemaker-1.1 I will be >> running a "testing|unstable" 1.1.3. > > You'll be enabling some unfinished features. > >> Have I understood it correctly? > > Essentially, yes.
thanks _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker