On 2012-12-07T15:09:09, Andrew Beekhof <and...@beekhof.net> wrote: > >> Ordering: absolutely > > Would any user not like the implied order? Instead want an asymmetrical > > or some curious one? > Conceptually it doesn't make any sense IMHO. > By definition things cant be in/on the container if the container > doesn't exist yet.
Agreed. They might want to specify *additional* ordering, but this one appears always implicit. -- Architect Storage/HA SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) "Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
