On 12/12/12 11:14, Gao,Yan wrote:
> On 12/12/12 01:53, David Vossel wrote:
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Yan Gao" <y...@suse.com>
>>> To: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
>>> Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 1:23:03 AM
>>> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Enable remote monitoring
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>> Here's the latest code:
>>> https://github.com/gao-yan/pacemaker/commit/4d58026c2171c42385c85162a0656c44b37fa7e8
>>>
>>>
>>> Now:
>>> - container-type:
>>>   * black - ordering, colocating
>>>   * white - ordering
>>>   Both them are not probed so far.
>>
>> I think for the sake of this implementation we should ignore the whitebox 
>> use case for now.  There are aspects of the whitebox use case that I'm just 
>> not sure about yet, and I don't want to hold you all up trying to define 
>> that. I don't mind re-approaching this container concept and expanding it to 
>> the whitebox use case later on building with what you have here.  I'm in 
>> favor of removing the "container-type" letting the blackbox use case be the 
>> default for now, and I'll go in and do our whitebox bits later. 
> Hmm, this might be better before we have a clear definition for whitebox.
Removed "container-type" for now. Pushed with several regression tests:

Regards,
  Gao,Yan
-- 
Gao,Yan <y...@suse.com>
Software Engineer
China Server Team, SUSE.

_______________________________________________
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker

Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org

Reply via email to