Hi Dejan, On 2013-03-06 11:59, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > Hi Hideo-san, > > On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 10:37:44AM +0900, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote: >> Hi Dejan, >> Hi Andrew, >> >> As for the crm shell, the check of the meta attribute was revised with the >> next patch. >> >> * http://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/crmsh/rev/d1174f42f4b3 >> >> This patch was backported in Pacemaker1.0.13. >> >> * >> https://github.com/ClusterLabs/pacemaker-1.0/commit/fa1a99ab36e0ed015f1bcbbb28f7db962a9d1abc#shell/modules/cibconfig.py >> >> However, the ordered,colocated attribute of the group resource is treated as >> an error when I use crm Shell which adopted this patch. >> >> -------------------------------------- >> (snip) >> ### Group Configuration ### >> group master-group \ >> vip-master \ >> vip-rep \ >> meta \ >> ordered="false" >> (snip) >> >> [root@rh63-heartbeat1 ~]# crm configure load update test2339.crm >> INFO: building help index >> crm_verify[20028]: 2013/03/06_17:57:18 WARN: unpack_nodes: Blind faith: not >> fencing unseen nodes >> WARNING: vip-master: specified timeout 60s for start is smaller than the >> advised 90 >> WARNING: vip-master: specified timeout 60s for stop is smaller than the >> advised 100 >> WARNING: vip-rep: specified timeout 60s for start is smaller than the >> advised 90 >> WARNING: vip-rep: specified timeout 60s for stop is smaller than the advised >> 100 >> ERROR: master-group: attribute ordered does not exist -----> WHY? >> Do you still want to commit? y >> -------------------------------------- >> >> If it chooses `yes` by a confirmation message, it is reflected, but it is a >> problem that error message is displayed. >> * The error occurs in the same way when I appoint colocated attribute. >> And....I noticed that there was not explanation of ordered,colocated of the >> group resource in online help of Pacemaker. >> >> I think that the designation of the ordered,colocated attribute should not >> become the error in group resource. >> In addition, I think that ordered,colocated should be added to online help. > > These attributes are not listed in crmsh. Does the attached patch > help?
Dejan, will this patch for the missing "ordered" and "collocated" group meta-attribute be included in the next crmsh release? ... can't see the patch in the current tip. Thanks & Regards, Andreas > > Thanks, > > Dejan >> >> Best Regards, >> Hideo Yamauchi. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org >> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker >> >> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org >> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf >> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org >> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker >> >> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org >> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf >> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
