On 19/04/2013, at 8:18 PM, emmanuel segura <emi2f...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't know why redhat doesn't give to the users the alternatives to use > what they want Because they'd have to support both options which means double the engineering + QE effort. More actually because people would end up using both and there would surely be subtle interaction issues. > > sorry for my ugly english :-) > > Thanks > > > 2013/4/19 T. <nos...@godawa.de> > Hi Chris, > > > No, you're definitely not missing anything. The 'pcs cluster cib' > > output isn't pretty. > why there is an approach to build a new config-tool at all? > > Why not use the crmsh? Why it was dropped in the RHEL-build? > Does it have some relevant disadvantages? > -- > To Answer please replace "invalid" with "de" ! > Zum Antworten bitte "invalid" durch "de" ersetzen ! > > > Chau y hasta luego, > > Thorolf > > > _______________________________________________ > Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker > > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf > Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org > > > > -- > esta es mi vida e me la vivo hasta que dios quiera > _______________________________________________ > Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker > > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf > Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org