20.06.2013 00:36, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > > On 20/06/2013, at 6:33 AM, Doug Clow <doug.c...@dashbox.com> wrote: > >> Hello All, >> >> I have some 2-node active-passive clusters that occasionally lose >> Corosync connectivity. The connectivity is fixed with a reboot. They >> don't have shared storage so stonith doesn't have to happen for another >> node to take control of the resource. Also they are VMs so I can't use a >> standard stonith method. > > fence_xvm works nicely for this most virt clusters, there was a vmware one > floating around at one point
Unfortunately matahari and libvirt-qmf (part of a picture, which connects hypervisor to fenced) are removed in 6.4. > >> I could use the vmware module, but then if the VM host was down, >> no node would take control. Is there a way to make stonith success not >> mandatory? > > You can turn it off... > >> That way the other node would always take control and then it would 'try' to >> reboot the other machine if possible. >> >> On a related issue, CentOS 6.4 doesn't come with the null or ssh >> devices. I've tried compiling from source but the resulting stonith >> modules are not in the Red Hat type of format. Is there a way to get the >> null or ssh device into CentOS? > > The RH ones are in the fence-agents package. > > > _______________________________________________ > Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker > > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf > Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org > _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org