On 06/28/2013 08:04 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > Under this model, not only do I have to find the time to write and test the > new addition, but I also have to: > * keep maintaining the old code until... when? > * probably write and maintain a compatibility layer > * make it possible to choose which gets used (a small but annoying task) > * make it possible to figure out which was in use for support > * educate people that there are two, and when to chose one over the other > * answer copious emails from confused users
Won't all this need to be settled before RHEL 7 ships anyway? There will be a 10 year support life of the version shipped on day 1, and I quite strongly expect that pcmk will have long-ago moved on while this version still needs supporting. Or will that part of things be handled but a team in RHEL, as you mentioned earlier about it being up to the EL people to sort out? I've got no opinion either way, I am just curious as a user how the mechanics of this work/will work. -- Digimer Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/ What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without access to education? _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org