Hi Andrew,
> >> Are you using the new attrd code or the legacy stuff?
> >
> > I use new attrd.
>
> And the values are not being sent to the cib at the same time?
As far as I looked. . .
When the transmission of the attribute of attrd of the node was late, a leader
of attrd seemed to send an attribute to cib without waiting for it.
> >> Only the new code makes (or at least should do) crmd-transition-delay
> >> redundant.
> >
> > It did not seem to work so that new attrd dispensed with
> > crmd-transition-delay to me.
> > I report the details again.
> > # Probably it will be Bugzilla. . .
>
> Sounds good
All right!
Many Thanks!
Hideo Yamauch.
--- On Tue, 2014/1/14, Andrew Beekhof <and...@beekhof.net> wrote:
>
> On 14 Jan 2014, at 4:13 pm, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote:
>
> > Hi Andrew,
> >
> > Thank you for comments.
> >
> >> Are you using the new attrd code or the legacy stuff?
> >
> > I use new attrd.
>
> And the values are not being sent to the cib at the same time?
>
> >
> >>
> >> If you're not using corosync 2.x or see:
> >>
> >> crm_notice("Starting mainloop...");
> >>
> >> then its the old code. The new code could also be used with CMAN but
> >> isn't configured to build for in that situation.
> >>
> >> Only the new code makes (or at least should do) crmd-transition-delay
> >> redundant.
> >
> > It did not seem to work so that new attrd dispensed with
> > crmd-transition-delay to me.
> > I report the details again.
> > # Probably it will be Bugzilla. . .
>
> Sounds good
>
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Hideo Yamauchi.
> >
> > --- On Tue, 2014/1/14, Andrew Beekhof <and...@beekhof.net> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On 14 Jan 2014, at 3:52 pm, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi All,
> >>>
> >>> I contributed next bugzilla by a problem to occur for the difference of
> >>> the timing of the attribute update by attrd before.
> >>> * https://developerbugs.linuxfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2528
> >>>
> >>> We can evade this problem now by using crmd-transition-delay parameter.
> >>>
> >>> I confirmed whether I could evade this problem by renewed attrd recently.
> >>> * In latest attrd, one became a leader and seemed to come to update an
> >>> attribute.
> >>>
> >>> However, latest attrd does not seem to substitute for
> >>> crmd-transition-delay.
> >>> * I contribute detailed log later.
> >>>
> >>> We are dissatisfied with continuing using crmd-transition-delay.
> >>> Is there the plan when attrd handles this problem well in the future?
> >>
> >> Are you using the new attrd code or the legacy stuff?
> >>
> >> If you're not using corosync 2.x or see:
> >>
> >> crm_notice("Starting mainloop...");
> >>
> >> then its the old code. The new code could also be used with CMAN but
> >> isn't configured to build for in that situation.
> >>
> >> Only the new code makes (or at least should do) crmd-transition-delay
> >> redundant.
> >>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
