Hi Andrew, It became late. I registered this problem by Bugzilla. The report file is attached, too.
* http://bugs.clusterlabs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5194 Best Regards, Hideo Yamauchi. --- On Tue, 2014/1/14, Andrew Beekhof <and...@beekhof.net> wrote: > > On 14 Jan 2014, at 4:33 pm, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote: > > > Hi Andrew, > > > >>>> Are you using the new attrd code or the legacy stuff? > >>> > >>> I use new attrd. > >> > >> And the values are not being sent to the cib at the same time? > > > > As far as I looked. . . > > When the transmission of the attribute of attrd of the node was late, a > > leader of attrd seemed to send an attribute to cib without waiting for it. > > And you have a delay configured? And this value was set prior to that delay > expiring? > > > > >>>> Only the new code makes (or at least should do) crmd-transition-delay > >>>> redundant. > >>> > >>> It did not seem to work so that new attrd dispensed with > >>> crmd-transition-delay to me. > >>> I report the details again. > >>> # Probably it will be Bugzilla. . . > >> > >> Sounds good > > > > All right! > > > > Many Thanks! > > Hideo Yamauch. > > > > --- On Tue, 2014/1/14, Andrew Beekhof <and...@beekhof.net> wrote: > > > >> > >> On 14 Jan 2014, at 4:13 pm, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote: > >> > >>> Hi Andrew, > >>> > >>> Thank you for comments. > >>> > >>>> Are you using the new attrd code or the legacy stuff? > >>> > >>> I use new attrd. > >> > >> And the values are not being sent to the cib at the same time? > >> > >>> > >>>> > >>>> If you're not using corosync 2.x or see: > >>>> > >>>> crm_notice("Starting mainloop..."); > >>>> > >>>> then its the old code. The new code could also be used with CMAN but > >>>> isn't configured to build for in that situation. > >>>> > >>>> Only the new code makes (or at least should do) crmd-transition-delay > >>>> redundant. > >>> > >>> It did not seem to work so that new attrd dispensed with > >>> crmd-transition-delay to me. > >>> I report the details again. > >>> # Probably it will be Bugzilla. . . > >> > >> Sounds good > >> > >>> > >>> Best Regards, > >>> Hideo Yamauchi. > >>> > >>> --- On Tue, 2014/1/14, Andrew Beekhof <and...@beekhof.net> wrote: > >>> > >>>> > >>>> On 14 Jan 2014, at 3:52 pm, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Hi All, > >>>>> > >>>>> I contributed next bugzilla by a problem to occur for the difference of > >>>>> the timing of the attribute update by attrd before. > >>>>> * https://developerbugs.linuxfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2528 > >>>>> > >>>>> We can evade this problem now by using crmd-transition-delay parameter. > >>>>> > >>>>> I confirmed whether I could evade this problem by renewed attrd > >>>>> recently. > >>>>> * In latest attrd, one became a leader and seemed to come to update an > >>>>> attribute. > >>>>> > >>>>> However, latest attrd does not seem to substitute for > >>>>> crmd-transition-delay. > >>>>> * I contribute detailed log later. > >>>>> > >>>>> We are dissatisfied with continuing using crmd-transition-delay. > >>>>> Is there the plan when attrd handles this problem well in the future? > >>>> > >>>> Are you using the new attrd code or the legacy stuff? > >>>> > >>>> If you're not using corosync 2.x or see: > >>>> > >>>> crm_notice("Starting mainloop..."); > >>>> > >>>> then its the old code. The new code could also be used with CMAN but > >>>> isn't configured to build for in that situation. > >>>> > >>>> Only the new code makes (or at least should do) crmd-transition-delay > >>>> redundant. > >>>> > >> > >> > > _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org