On 06/11/14 16:35, Kostiantyn Ponomarenko wrote: > And that is like roulette, in case we lose the lowest nodeid we lose all. > So I can lose only the node which doesn't have the lowest nodeid? > And it's not useful in 2 node cluster. > Am i correct?
It may be usefull. If you define roles of the nodes, like this: – node 2: 'master' node – node 1: 'backup' node and monitor node availability to replace backup when it fails, then you can get quite a high availability. It won't work in Active/Active or peer-to-peer (all nodes equal) setups, though. Greets, Jacek _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
