On 12/06/14 00:51, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
Chrissy? Can you shed some light here?
On 11 Jun 2014, at 11:26 pm, Kostiantyn Ponomarenko
<konstantin.ponomare...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi guys,
I am trying to deal somehow with split brain situation in 2 node cluster using
votequorum.
Here is a quorum section in my corosync.conf:
provider: corosync_votequorum
expected_votes: 2
wait_for_all: 1
last_man_standing: 1
auto_tie_breaker: 1
My question is about behavior of the remaining node after I shout down node
with the lowest nodeid.
My expectation is that after a last_man_standing_window this node should be
back working.
Or in the case of two node cluster it is not a solution?
If you want symmetric failure handing into a 2 node cluster then the
two_node option might be more appropriate. auto_tie_breaker and
last_man_standing are more useful for larger clusters where a network
split leaves more than one node in a partition.
Chrissie
_______________________________________________
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
