https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834516
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar <ppi...@redhat.com> ---
Source file is original. Ok.
Summary verified from lib/Devel/StringInfo.pm.
FIX: Add `or MIT' to the licenses (lib/Devel/StringInfo.pm).
Description verified from lib/Devel/StringInfo.pm. Ok.
No XS code, noarch BuildArch is Ok.
URL and Source0 are usable. Ok.
Build-requires are Ok.
All tests pass. Ok.
$ rpmlint perl-Devel-StringInfo.spec
../SRPMS/perl-Devel-StringInfo-0.04-1.fc18.src.rpm
../RPMS/noarch/perl-Devel-StringInfo-0.04-1.fc18.noarch.rpm
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
rpmlint is Ok.
$ rpm -q -lv -p ../RPMS/noarch/perl-Devel-StringInfo-0.04-1.fc18.noarch.rpm
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Jun 22 15:04
/usr/share/doc/perl-Devel-StringInfo-0.04
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 160 May 14 2009
/usr/share/doc/perl-Devel-StringInfo-0.04/Changes
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3365 Jun 22 15:04
/usr/share/man/man3/Devel::StringInfo.3pm.gz
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Jun 22 15:04
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Devel
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 7976 May 14 2009
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Devel/StringInfo.pm
File layout and permissions are Ok.
$ rpm -q --requires -p
../RPMS/noarch/perl-Devel-StringInfo-0.04-1.fc18.noarch.rpm |sort |uniq -c
1 perl(Encode)
1 perl(Encode::Guess)
1 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
1 perl(Moose)
1 perl(namespace::clean)
1 perl(Scalar::Util)
1 perl(Sub::Exporter)
1 perl(Tie::IxHash)
1 perl(utf8)
1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1
1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
1 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1
FIX: Run-require `perl(YAML)' (lib/Devel/StringInfo.pm:77).
FIX: Run-require `perl(Data::HexDump::XXD)' (lib/Devel/StringInfo.pm:91).
$ rpm -q --provides -p
../RPMS/noarch/perl-Devel-StringInfo-0.04-1.fc18.noarch.rpm |sort |uniq -c
1 perl(Devel::StringInfo) = 0.04
1 perl-Devel-StringInfo = 0.04-1.fc18
Binary provides are Ok.
Package builds in F18
(http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4188014). ???
Otherwise package is in line with Fedora and Perl packaging guidelines.
Please correct all `FIX' prefix issues and provides new spec file.
Resolution: Package NOT approved.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
