https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834582
Gerard Ryan <ger...@ryan.lt> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from Gerard Ryan <ger...@ryan.lt> ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> It really *IS* named %{name}.spec. You can extract the SRPM and you'll see
> it is named "java-deptools.spec". Only the name in the URL used only for
> this review is different.
>
Ah yes, my mistake (or the mistake of fedora-review tool, rather).
>
> Guidelines says that "original files" should have their timestamps
> preserved, but files in "target/site/apidocs" are NOT original files -- they
> are being generated during build time. Their times are set during the build
> time and preserving them makes no sense. The only original file, pom.xml,
> does have its timestamp preserved.
Yes, you are right!
Everything else looks good, thanks for such a useful tool!
================
*** APPROVED ***
================
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
