Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823344
--- Comment #13 from Vít Ondruch <vondr...@redhat.com> --- (In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #9) > > Julian, the name of the package should be changed from 'rubygem-ohai' to > > just 'ohai' as per the naming guidelines, because it provides user space > > tools/utilities. > > > > See: > > https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Packaging: > > Ruby&oldid=306009#Naming_Guidelines > > Completely agree with you. Chef will also be named "chef" when I get to that > point. I am unsure about it. This refers especially to applications as described in application section of Ruby guidelines [1]. Not sure if this is the case for Chef, but this is what Ohai upstream says about Ohai: "It can be used standalone, but its primary purpose is to provide node data to Chef." According to this statement, Ohai should be packaged as a gem and named according to it, i.e. rubygem-ohai. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Ruby#Applications -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=dbEHwA7ng2&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
