Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=920909
--- Comment #8 from Michael Catanzaro <mike.catanz...@gmail.com> --- Thanks Kalev. According to the Fedora Licensing FAQ, the GPLv2+ notice buried in the documentation, though not ideal, sufficiently addresses this issue from a Fedora packaging perspective, correct? I do want to add license headers if possible, but I can't add myself as a copyright holder to most of the files as I haven't significantly modified most of them. Can you advise on the appropriate course of action - would it be proper to say "Copyright <year of modification> The GNOME Chess Developers" or something like that? The About dialog issue seems separate a bit of a mess; most older GNOME apps have a separate license tab which contains the copyright notice specifying GPLv2+, while most newer ones just use a GtkLicense, which just links to the license. Chess used to have a License tab, but it was replaced with a GtkLicense two years ago since the About tab needs to be internationalized, but there doesn't seem to be a way to internationalize multi-line strings in Vala[1]. I guess the GtkLicense works well for other projects that do have license notices in the source. [1]https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=647090#c2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Wiv9aOfRqr&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
