Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=920909
--- Comment #9 from Kalev Lember <kalevlem...@gmail.com> --- (In reply to comment #8) > According to the Fedora Licensing FAQ, the GPLv2+ notice buried in the > documentation, though not ideal, sufficiently addresses this issue from a > Fedora packaging perspective, correct? I believe so. Good find! > I do want to add license headers if possible, but I can't add myself as a > copyright holder to most of the files as I haven't significantly modified > most of them. Can you advise on the appropriate course of action - would it > be proper to say "Copyright <year of modification> The GNOME Chess > Developers" or something like that? Sounds good to me, but I am not a lawyer. I have seen other prominent projects use a similar construction too though, for example most of Chromium has "Copyright (c) 2012 The Chromium Authors", e.g. http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome/trunk/src/chrome_frame/bho.cc -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=m88WYc41yG&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
