https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970009
--- Comment #24 from Simone Caronni <negativ...@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Kevin Cernekee from comment #21) > (In reply to Simone Caronni from comment #13) > If you do manage to revive the libtomcrypt package, it might be a good idea > to see if dropbear (which currently bundles libtomcrypt) can use it. True, I will file a bug on it. > > Actually I preferred the GnuTLS patch, including the 5 files from > > libtomcrypt makes things more complicated when packaging. > > OK - I don't have a strong opinion one way or the other. The "5 files" code > was experimental and I can just kill off that branch. Actually libtomcrypt is used now only by 1 package (2 if we count dropbear not using the bundled library): # repoquery --whatrequires "libtomcrypt.so.0()(64bit)" libtomcrypt-devel-0:1.17-14.fc18.x86_64 libtomcrypt-devel-0:1.17-15.fc18.x86_64 olpc-os-builder-0:6.0.0-1.fc19.x86_64 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=syUOG3lAA1&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
