https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996489
--- Comment #7 from Axilleas Pipinellis <axill...@archlinux.gr> --- A(In reply to Vít Ondruch from comment #6) > > > > 3, Should the license be "X11 or MIT" (taken from the README)? Since only > > > MIT is included as a standalone file and in the .gemspec, it's probably > > > better to list only MIT. Maybe you can ask upstream for clarification? > > > > I filled an issue: https://github.com/flori/tins/issues/5 > > They are the same license, MIT for is the right one for Fedora. > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main#Software_License_List Anyhow, the author was kind enough to release a 0.8.4 version, which clarifies the license :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=l1yWQ9QWgK&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
