https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023601
--- Comment #3 from Ricky Elrod <rel...@redhat.com> --- I'm fine with calling this ghc-aeson-pretty (or hackage-aeson-pretty :P). aeson-pretty is what cblrpm defaulted to on this though. Should I just combine the subpackage it made (ghc-aeson-pretty) and the base package (aeson-pretty) into ghc-aeson-pretty? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
