https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023601
--- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen <peter...@redhat.com> --- Sorry I see I didn't answer your actual question: > Should I just combine the subpackage it made (ghc-aeson-pretty) and the base > package (aeson-pretty) into ghc-aeson-pretty? Hmm it probably depends on the use case of the executable. For some packages we put the program into the devel package because that made sense. Another approach if it doesn't make sense to do that or to exclude the program, might also be to subpackage it as aeson-pretty. (Typically for libraries that include some test/demo program we just remove it completely.) (Other previous examples include highlighting-kate (rename review submitted) and ghc-derive (already renamed!).) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
