https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172525
--- Comment #8 from Vladimir Stackov <amigo.el...@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #7) > Poring over the spec file, sources, and resulting RPMS is still required, > unless we develop an AI to do it ;). There are automated tools, which catch > some more errors, but yield many false positives, so their output still > needs to be trimmed: > rpmlint > fedora-review Thank you for your reply! I'm not pushing, just thinking out loud :) BTW What was the average informal review "threshold" for new packagers? I just wanted to know if I need to write more or just to wait for some response. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
