https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203018
--- Comment #6 from Marcin Haba <marcin.h...@bacula.pl> --- Thank you for all comments and advises. I will work on them. I tested Baculum with Apache and Lighttpd. I chose Lighttpd, because it supports HTTP Basic auth with plain text user:password format stored on a authfile. It is useful and used to internal communication between Baculum's layers and for multi-users mode. It also makes available to modify Baculum HTTP Basic users from Baculum interface and "on fly". In case Apache webserver does not support this typy of user:password storing as plain text and it causes that Baculum can have only one pre-defined user, without multi-user mode and without possibility to modify auth params from Baculum interface. Summing up, Baculum can work with other webservers. If webserver supports plain text user:password format, then works in multi user mode and with possibility to change password from Baculum interface. If webserver does not support this type of HTTP Basic auth, user need to modify auth file, for example by htpasswd binary for Apache. I described Apache configuration in README file. Anyway, I will follow on your advice about provide other servers configuration files, at least sample configuration for these webservers. About SELinux, that was a point that I was not sure. Thank you for indicateing me what should I do. I will back here when I am ready with all changes. Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
