https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109390
--- Comment #13 from Jens Petersen <peter...@redhat.com> --- (In reply to Milan Bouchet-Valat from comment #12) > The Haskell compiler has done the same recently with LLVM 3.4, for the very > same reason: Yeah I we probably need llvm35 too for ghc-7.10 > Jens, Mukundan: could you comment on your experience with packaging llvm3.4? Once you have llvm34.spec it should be pretty trivial to tweak it to llvm33. You can give it a try locally first. :) You can't see llvm34? (comment 11) (I still vote for calling this llvm33;) Are there any other packages with '.' in their name (without a '-')? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
