https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109390
--- Comment #15 from Milan Bouchet-Valat <nalimi...@club.fr> --- Actually, I already have an llvm3.3 package ready for a long time, which I can rename to llvm33. I was more asking for your opinion about having another versioned-LLVM package in Fedora, since anyway I'd need support to get this review request accepted. I don't need clang, and indeed I realized the build fails if I enable it in 64-bit Rawhide (but not in other versions). Is that expected? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
