https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287756
--- Comment #6 from Mikolaj Izdebski <mizde...@redhat.com> --- (In reply to jiri vanek from comment #5) > > There is no license file installed. You should add license file to upstream > > repo and install it using %license macro. > > Currently I have no intentions to add license. Maybe I will in some future > iteration (maybe when We agree with rest of team) But It wil be BSD or some > other free license for sure. If it is BSD license then you have to include license text in the package and there is no way around that. > > Source0 based on hg repo tip is a bad idea. You should use proper tags > > (preferably) or revision numbers / commit IDs. > > Sure. For now I had added revision number. In future, when there will be > releases, it will be replaced by tags. If you use revision number then Release tag should comply with guidelines at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Snapshot_packages, so it should be something like 0.1.20151203hg606138e2ec24 > > - Empty sections (%prep, %install) can be removed. > unless you insists, I would like to keep them in. Just for "look and know" Sure, that's fine. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
