https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1304882
--- Comment #20 from awill...@redhat.com <awill...@redhat.com> --- so sadly, just ditching the log file stuff doesn't work, because geekotest of course can't create /var/log/openqa (as it doesn't have the necessary permissions on /var/log). d'oh. So effectively we have the same issue openSUSE has. I see a few options: 1) put the dodges back in the spec 2) use tmpfiles 3) just create /var/log/openqa owned by geekotest in %install and package it 4) log to /var/log/openqa/openqa 5) log to the goddamn system log I kinda like 5 because it saves me from all sorts of concerns, but it'd require an upstream change. Ditto 4 (could be done with a trivial patch but I really don't want to patch downstream if we can possibly avoid it), and if I'm gonna change upstream I'd rather go 5. 3 is simple but means the logs disappear if the package is removed, I guess. 2 is simple but tmpfiles claims to be for 'temporary and volatile files', a log file doesn't really seem to fit the bill (unless we consider it 'volatile'?), do you really think this is an appropriate use? 1 is kinda hinky but at least we know it works. I'm going to sleep, night. :) let me know what you think. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
