https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305365
--- Comment #6 from gil cattaneo <punto...@libero.it> ---
ISSUES:
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated". 10 files have unknown license. Detailed
output of licensecheck in
/home/gil/1305365-concurrentunit/licensecheck.txt
Source files are missing license headers. Would you please contact upstream to
fix it?
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines?rd=Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Clarification
concurrentunit-concurrentunit-0.4.2/src/main/java/net/jodah/concurrentunit/ConcurrentTestCase.java
concurrentunit-concurrentunit-0.4.2/src/main/java/net/jodah/concurrentunit/Waiter.java
concurrentunit-concurrentunit-0.4.2/src/main/java/net/jodah/concurrentunit/internal/ReentrantCircuit.java
NON blocking issues:
[?]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
if you remove <optional>true</optional> you don't need to add Requires:
hamcrest
concurrentunit.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/share/doc/concurrentunit/README.md
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
