https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305365



--- Comment #9 from Wolfgang Ulbrich <chat-to...@raveit.de> ---
From my point of view the Apache Software License 2.0 is fine, see
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main?rd=Licensing#SoftwareLicenses
But it looks like that upstream has forgotten to add a header to the License in
tarball.
See APPENDIX: How to apply the Apache License to your work
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
I suggest to ask at fedora-legal mailing list if it is really necessary that
upstream have to add this header.
Rest of the package looks good and i can approve it if this point is clear.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to