https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366047
--- Comment #28 from l...@us.ibm.com --- (In reply to Tomas Mraz from comment #26) > (In reply to lo1 from comment #24) > > The developer has been using nonstandard variables such as LNFLAGS (as > > opposed to LDFLAGS) and CCFLAGS (for CFLAGS) etc. There were other compile > > flags such as CCLFLAGS for compiling library and CCAFLAGS for compiling > > application. > > > > Would that be OK to keep the naming of those nonstandard variables, while > > I'm making sure that the build includes hardending and optimalization with > > the RPM_OPT_FLAGS? > Done. I see that 2016-09-27 is the date for 100% Code Complete Deadline. We don't expect there is any more code change, once the package is accepted. If it gets accepted, are there any other steps that has to happen other than checking in the code before 9/27 on my part? I did see that the bug status has to be ON_QA, but I wonder how long it'll take from package acceptance till the bug is moved to ON_QA. Please advise. Thanks, Vicky -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
