https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373782
--- Comment #4 from Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <nmavr...@redhat.com> --- (In reply to Jakub Hrozek from comment #3) > (In reply to Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos from comment #2) > > Not sure what you mean about (5). > > Sorry, yes, that was unclear :) > > In Fedora, we have a separate library that contains the statically-built > libcmocka version: I did not need the static libraries, that's why I didn't add them. I've updated the spec to generate them. > I was wondering if the mingw packaging should do the same, because the > fedora-review tool was complaining about a static library in a package that > doesn't end with -static. But I don't know what is the right mingw > packaging.. Note that .dll.a is used for linking and is not a static library (I didn't see the fedora review message, but I guess it is referring on them). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
