https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419122
--- Comment #14 from Marcel Haerry <mh+fed...@scrit.ch> --- (In reply to Simone Caronni from comment #11) > (In reply to Sascha Spreitzer from comment #8) > > Must: > > ! license file in all packages > > Actually you need to make sure that the license is available in any package > installation combination. So judging by a quick look from the spec file, the > -doc subpackage requires the main package to be installed, so the license is > enough to be available in the main package as it is always installed when > -doc is. Oh that's good to know. I already wondered why gem2rpm would create an invalid specfile. But given that background, I understand it that fedora-review is wrong here and I can revert the commit. Fine? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
