https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1541566
--- Comment #2 from Matthew <mruszczy...@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #1) Thank you very much for the comments. > Just preliminary comments: > > - Split your Requires on multiple lines Done. > - Is it really necessary to split the python part into a separate library > package? It doesn't seem to be used as a library, only as a binary. I did this after asking a few questions in the #fedora-devel irc. They seemed to indicate that it was abnormal to not split python packages this way to make future python 3 support easier to setup. Is that incorrect? > - Python2 is EOL soon, it would be better to build with Python 3 instead, > unless it's incompatible. Currently the application is incompatible. There is a bug filed in github here (https://github.com/JoeLametta/whipper/issues/78) but no major work has been put into it yet. > - add a comment to explain why the patch is needed Sure thing. While I rebuild the package, the patch moves the accuraterip-checksum binary from /usr/local to /usr/bin to comply with the packaging guidelines https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Filesystem_Layout -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
