https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1541566
--- Comment #6 from William Moreno <williamjmore...@gmail.com> ---
> > - Is it really necessary to split the python part into a separate library
> > package? It doesn't seem to be used as a library, only as a binary.
>
> I did this after asking a few questions in the #fedora-devel irc. They
> seemed to indicate that it was abnormal to not split python packages this
> way to make future python 3 support easier to setup. Is that incorrect?
>
It is not common in Fedora packaging to split a python package in a %{name}
package and a python2-%{name} subpackage, the only reason to do dat is if the
python2-%{name} is a module importable and usefull without the executable files
in %{name}, but this are few bites of direference for the user point of view.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
