https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540335
--- Comment #5 from Kim Walisch <kim.wali...@gmail.com> --- Hi Micheal, Thanks for your feedback. I have fixed the issues you pointed out and pushed a new version of the spec and SRPM to GitHub: Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/kimwalisch/primesieve-rpm/master/primesieve.spec SRPM URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/kimwalisch/primesieve-rpm/master/primesieve-6.4-3.fc27.src.rpm Note that I have also fixed the following issues pointed out by Jerry James: > %post -p /sbin/ldconfig > %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig > should be replaced with this: > %ldconfig_scriptlets 1) Done, use ldconfig_scriptlets. > Also, the spec file at the URL given in the review bug has release > number 2, but the one inside the SRPM has release number 1. > Make sure those match. 2) Done, spec release number now matches SRPM release number. > ...it is a good idea for the binary and the library to be in separate packages. 3) I have now put the binary in the primesieve package, the shared libprimesieve and the header files are in the libprimesieve-devel package and the static libprimesieve is in the libprimesieve-static package. The naming of the packages is similar to Debian/Ubuntu where the binary is in primesieve and the libraries and header in libprimesieve-dev. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
