https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1859207

Zdenek Dohnal <zdoh...@redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|                            |needinfo?(fed...@svgames.pl
                   |                            |)



--- Comment #4 from Zdenek Dohnal <zdoh...@redhat.com> ---
(In reply to Artur Iwicki from comment #3)
> This isn't anyhow related to being a maintainer or not. /archive/ on GitHub
> allows you to fetch whatever commit or tag you want. /archive/something.tgz
> and /archive/something/filename.tgz are just two ways to get the same
> auto-generated archive (with a different name) containing the repo at a
> given commit/tag.

Hmm, interesting. It works now. I had a problem with this source url unless
upstream had an explicit link (meaning he uploaded a tarball manually too,
instead of just marking the new release with git tag) in github releases in the
past (aprox 3 years ago), so I used the trick which fixed it at that time.

So either I was doing something wrong or github made it work.

Either way, thanks! Uploaded the fixed spec.

Are you planning to take the review? I would like to know if I should offer the
review e.g. on the mailing list.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to