https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1081434



--- Comment #43 from Peter Bieringer <p...@bieringer.de> ---
If no maintainer will be found, I can act as (ipv6calc is supporting that
library anyhow)

btw: RPM build from current source works fine (beside some minor compiler
warnings, which I have already fixed in my fork):

wget https://github.com/chrislim2888/IP2Location-C-Library/archive/8.0.9.tar.gz
rpmbuild -ts 8.0.9.tar.gz
rpmbuild --rebuild IP2Location-8.0.9-5.el8.src.rpm

> in source included spec file is at least working


=> have I to apply for maintainer or can one trigger the workflow?

Beside that, the RPM name should be proper defined in advance:

a) suggestion from 2014: ip2location-c

b) current github project: IP2Location-C-Library

I would vote for b) in alignment to GeoIP-*


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to