https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1081434
Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 <zebo...@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |zebo...@gmail.com --- Comment #45 from Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 <zebo...@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Peter Bieringer from comment #43) > If no maintainer will be found, I can act as (ipv6calc is supporting that > library anyhow) > > btw: RPM build from current source works fine (beside some minor compiler > warnings, which I have already fixed in my fork): > > wget > https://github.com/chrislim2888/IP2Location-C-Library/archive/8.0.9.tar.gz > rpmbuild -ts 8.0.9.tar.gz > rpmbuild --rebuild IP2Location-8.0.9-5.el8.src.rpm > > > in source included spec file is at least working > > > => have I to apply for maintainer or can one trigger the workflow? > > Beside that, the RPM name should be proper defined in advance: > > a) suggestion from 2014: ip2location-c > > b) current github project: IP2Location-C-Library > > I would vote for b) in alignment to GeoIP-* If you want to maintain this, start a new review request with you SPEC and SRPM. Then close this bug as a Duplicate of yours. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org