Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665544

--- Comment #6 from Stanislav Ochotnicky <socho...@redhat.com> 2011-01-14 
03:58:00 EST ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> The updated spec file removes the dependency on main package. Does the 
> -javadoc
> subpackage also need a copy of the license then?

Ah, yes. Sorry I didn't mention this in the review. You need to include license
in the javadoc subpackage now.

I now noticed you include src/main/java/org/ini4j/package.html. We don't
normally include this file in the doc as people who want docs install javadoc
subpackages.

> > [!]  If package uses custom depmap "-Dmaven2.jpp.depmap.file=*" explain why
> > it's needed in a comment
> > Removing activation is OK, but please file a bug for plexus-mail-sender to
> > provide correct depmap. I'll work on fixing it in the meantime :-)
> 
> Filed as bug 669495.

Thank you.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to