Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665544 --- Comment #7 from Omair Majid <oma...@redhat.com> 2011-01-17 11:25:49 EST --- Spec URL: http://omajid.fedorapeople.org/ini4j/ini4j.spec SRPM URL: http://omajid.fedorapeople.org/ini4j/ini4j-0.4.1-3.fc15.src.rpm (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > > The updated spec file removes the dependency on main package. Does the > > -javadoc > > subpackage also need a copy of the license then? > > Ah, yes. Sorry I didn't mention this in the review. You need to include > license > in the javadoc subpackage now. > > I now noticed you include src/main/java/org/ini4j/package.html. We don't > normally include this file in the doc as people who want docs install javadoc > subpackages. > Fixed. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
