https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2057302
--- Comment #7 from marlin.so...@laro.se --- > Would it be worth making a -firmware subpackage and making it noarch? > Assuming the firmware is arch independent and builds the same on different > arches? The client software prefers using "matched" firmware on the device, so building and including a firmware image with sane defaults will allow this, without requiring users to install a separate package. The firmware is small and is ideally included in the package so users can 'hit the ground running'. The spec builds clean once strip is overridden and debug disabled, which I think is the least intrusive way to do this. Are there any other blockers or changes to be made? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2057302 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
