Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659082 --- Comment #7 from Orcan Ogetbil <oget.fed...@gmail.com> 2011-01-29 08:22:25 EST --- According to the packaging list, it is best to make a -common subpackage, and put the common files in there. All the other packages will require the -common subpackage. The license of the -common subpackage should be what upstream claims as the license of their software. Note that there are multiple license files. If a particular license file does not apply to a particular subpackage, then we can't put that license file into the -common package. (LGPLv2+ or ASL 2.0 or MPLv1.0 ?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
