https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2222367



--- Comment #3 from Mattia Verga <mattia.ve...@proton.me> ---
(In reply to Fabio Valentini from comment #2)
> Quick comments from Rust point of view:
> 
> - outdated BuildRequires:
> 
> "BuildRequires:  rust-packaging" is obsolete, that package no longer exists.
> Use "cargo-rpm-macros" instead (which Provides: "rust-packaging" now for
> backwards compatibility).
Fixed

> 
> - license information is generated but discarded
> 
> You correctly collect license information for statically linked Rust
> components:
> 
> > %cargo_license_summary
> > %{cargo_license} > LICENSES.dependencies
> 
> But this information is then unused and discarded. The
> LICENSE(S).dependencies file should be marked as %license (not sure if the
> %pyproject_save_files thing recognises it, probably not), and the output of
> the %cargo_license_summary macro should also be used to full the value of
> the License tag of the "python3-rpds-py" sub-package (which is missing).
> 
> You can take a look at rpm-sequoia for an example of what's currently
> considered "best practice":
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-rpm-sequoia/blob/rawhide/f/rust-rpm-
> sequoia.spec#_25-38

The LICENSES.dependencies file is already added to the package by python macros
in the same dir as the main license file. Is there a way to know it is
correctly labeled with %license?

Spec URL: https://mattia.fedorapeople.org/rpds-py/python-rpds-py.spec
SRPM URL:
https://mattia.fedorapeople.org/rpds-py/python-rpds-py-0.8.10-1.fc39.src.rpm


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2222367

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202222367%23c3
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to