Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674180 --- Comment #4 from Julian Aloofi <julian.fed...@googlemail.com> 2011-02-07 09:09:27 EST --- > > - The headers of the source files state: > > "GNU General Public License [...]; either version 2 of > > the License or (at your option) version 3 or any later version > > accepted by the membership of KDE e.V." > > so GPLv3+ is somehow an oversimplification, isn't it? > > Probably yes. I'll try and find other applications with these licensing terms > in Fedora and see what they did, if I can't find any I'll send a mail to > Fedora > legal. I've spotted the license in Yakuake as well, and it doesn't have any special stuff in the "License:" field, so I guess this is OK. Here are the latest packages so far: Spec URL: http://julian.fedorapeople.org/knights/knights.spec SRPM URL: http://julian.fedorapeople.org/knights/knights-2.2.0-2.fc14.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
