https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2434126
--- Comment #5 from Ben Beasley <[email protected]> --- I see that the uploaded spec file (unlike the spec file in the uploaded RPM) has these lines in rust2rpm.toml for all the rust-either_n+<foo>-devel feature metapackages: > Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} It’s not necessary to add these: these metapackages already have exact-version dependencies like "crate(either_n) = 0.2.0" that will be satisfied by the main -devel package. If it were really necessary for feature metapackages to have even stricter dependencies including release numbers, then that ought to be changed in rust2rpm rather than repeatedly customizing individual spec files. Besides that, these added dependencies are on a "rust-either_n" binary package, which doesn’t exist, rather than on "rust-either_n-devel", so the resulting feature metapackages would not be installable. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2434126 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202434126%23c5 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
