Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690919 --- Comment #3 from Mario Blättermann <mari...@freenet.de> 2011-05-08 15:13:52 EDT --- Look here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=684475#c6 The incorrect FSF address doesn't affect the build process or the security of the package in no way. If there was an active upstream project, I would patch the package and send the patch to the maintainers. But in our case, it is impossible. BTW, I'm sure this affects some other packages whose upstream is dead and which are moved through the distribution releases over years. Well, it would be fine to have a common guideline for it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
