Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690919

Tom "spot" Callaway <tcall...@redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Blocks|182235(FE-Legal)            |

--- Comment #5 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcall...@redhat.com> 2011-05-09 
14:11:24 EDT ---
Handling the "incorrect-fsf-address" issue in situations where upstream is
dead/non-responsive is ultimately up to the package maintainer. It should be
safe for the maintainer to replace the older COPYING file with an updated one
(note, this means getting a newer COPYING with the correct address from the FSF
website for the same license version, not for a different version of that
license), however, if the maintainer chooses not to take that action, it is not
considered a blocker. Lifting FE-Legal.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to