Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=756443

--- Comment #3 from Juan Orti Alcaine <j.orti.alca...@gmail.com> 2011-12-13 
16:45:20 EST ---
(In reply to comment #1)

Hello, I have updated the package, the new files are here:

Spec URL:
https://raw.github.com/jorti/cagraph-fedora-package/v1.2-8/SPECS/python-cagraph.spec
SRPM URL:
https://github.com/jorti/cagraph-fedora-package/raw/v1.2-8/SRPMS/python-cagraph-1.2-8.fc16.src.rpm

> According to the files, license is GPLv3+, not GPLv3

Fixed.

> rm -rf %{buildroot}/*, clean section and buildroot definition are not
> necessary, if you're not aiming for EPEL 5:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/GuidelinesAndPolicies#BuildRoot_tag

I would like to be able to compile it for EPEL, because this library is used by
tor-arm, a monitor for Tor routers which I also submited to review in bug
#756445

> The if clause for Suse is no use in Fedora. I guess you're trying to keep a
> single spec for Suse and Fedora. I don't know Suse's guidelines, but that 
> might
> not work.

All references to Suse removed.

> Don't install the documentation on your own. Only use %doc in the files
> section: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Documentation

Fixed.

> FSF postal address is wrong:

Fixed. I include a patch and also submitted it upstream

> I think this package should have "python" in the name:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Addon_Packages_.28python_modules.29

Renamed.

> I suppose you can use a single chmod to change all the py file's permissions.

Done.

Now the output of rpmlint is clean:

$ rpmlint SPECS/python-cagraph.spec
RPMS/noarch/python-cagraph-1.2-8.fc16.noarch.rpm
SRPMS/python-cagraph-1.2-8.fc16.src.rpm 
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to