Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771111 --- Comment #13 from Ofer Schreiber <oschr...@redhat.com> 2012-01-02 04:57:05 EST --- I've uploaded a new TAR/SRPM/SPEC into http://oschreib.fedorapeople.org/ovirt-engine-sdk/ with fixes for all the issues mentioned above. upstream notified about the licensing issues, I hope to get a new license files soon (and a official tarball release as well). Few questions/notes: 1. I've noticed that after removing the BuildArch, rpmlint complains "E: no-binary", is that OK? 2. About the unowned dir: I thought that specifying a dir name without the "dir" prefix includes the dir with all the content inside. after fixing that, rpmbuild complains "warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ovirtsdk", is that OK? 3. About *-devel naming: the upstream project is called "ovirt-engine-sdk", So I thought it's the right name for this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review