Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771111

--- Comment #13 from Ofer Schreiber <oschr...@redhat.com> 2012-01-02 04:57:05 
EST ---
I've uploaded a new TAR/SRPM/SPEC into
http://oschreib.fedorapeople.org/ovirt-engine-sdk/ with fixes for all the
issues mentioned above.

upstream notified about the licensing issues, I hope to get a new license files
soon (and a official tarball release as well).

Few questions/notes:
1. I've noticed that after removing the BuildArch, rpmlint complains "E:
no-binary", is that OK?
2. About the unowned dir: I thought that specifying a dir name without the
"dir" prefix includes the dir with all the content inside. after fixing that,
rpmbuild complains "warning: File listed twice:
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ovirtsdk", is that OK?
3. About *-devel naming: the upstream project is called "ovirt-engine-sdk", So
I thought it's the right name for this package.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to