Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728302

--- Comment #15 from Rex Dieter <rdie...@math.unl.edu> 2012-01-07 09:48:03 EST 
---
some more now,

6.  Licensing.   using licensecheck too, seems all files include the gpl 'or
later' clause, so we can go with
License: GPLv2+

7. use the included configure script (esp to control build options, see 8). 
unless there's some good reasons not to, and if so, please document them in a
.spec comment

8.  bundled libraries in third_party, to better ensure they're not used, add
build options:
--with-external-speex
--with-external-gsm
--with-external-pa
will require additional BuildRequires for each of these, like
BuildRequires: speex-devel
BuildRequires: gsm-devel
BuildRequires: portaudio-devel
respectively

(there's other stuff in there that requires more scrutiny, but this is a good
first effort)

9. document in %build section comment that %{?_smp_mflags} cannot be used

10. drop/omit empty main pkg, ie, remove 
%files
and only do
%files devel
...

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to