Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798998 --- Comment #4 from David Tardon <dtar...@redhat.com> 2012-03-13 06:41:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Thanks. Meanwhile, I've had a look at things other than just the spec file: > > > * The licensing is not clear yet. Spec says: I am looking into it. > * I assume you are aware of these few items which are not needed in spec files > anymore: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#File_Permissions > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#.25clean Yes, I am. The last time I tried to make a package without them rpmlint issued warnings about it, so I just put them back and have not tried to do it ever again. If rmplint has been fixed in the meanwhile, fine, I will remove them eventually. > * There's an old packaging trick to ship subpackage documentation in the > subpackage's own versioned docdir. I do not care either way... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
